Icons: compression fixes & larger dimension support (#3564)

* toolbox, gui: fixes for compressed icon handling
* ufbt: fixes for generated vscode project
* scripts: increased max dimensions for image converter
* icon type changes
* linter fixes; api sync
* gui: docs fix
* toolbox: fixed potential decoder buffer overflow
* minor cleanup
* fbt: sdk: suppressed deprecation warnings in API table
* toolbox: compress: added unit tests
   vscode: now installs resources for unit_tests
   unit_tests: now loads subghz region data
* toolbox: compress: review fixes, pt 1
* compress: now passes decoder buffer size as constructor argument; auto-resize decoder buffer; crash on failed icon decompression
* PVS fixes
* pvs fixes, pt2
* doxygen fixes
* investigating unit test failures
* investigating unit test failures
* investigating unit test failures
* investigating unit test failures
* investigating unit test failures
* UnitTests: move all tests into plugins, brakes testing
* UnitTests: add plugin API and update plugin entrypoints
* UniTests: Test runner that works with plugins
* fbt: extra filtering for extapps to include in build
* UnitTests: filter tests by name
* loader: restored API table for unit_test build config
* Add various missing symbols to API table
* UnitTest: fail on plugin load error
* UnitTests: cleanup plugin api and reporting
* unit_tests: composite resolver
* UnitTests: remove unused declaration
* unit_tests, nfc: moved mock nfc implementation to libnfc
* unit_tests: api: removed redundant #define
* toolbox: compress: removed size_hint for icons; triggering furi_check on oversized icons
* gui: icon, icon_animation: removed size hit APIs
* Format Sources. Cleanup code.
* loader: refuse to start .fal as app
* toolbox: compress: fixed memory corruption in operations with small destination buffer; added unit tests for that case
* unit_tests: proper test skipping; better selective test interface
* unit_tests: moved 'loading' logging to proper location

Co-authored-by: あく <alleteam@gmail.com>

applications/debug/unit_tests/tests/furi/furi_memmgr_test.c

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+#include "../test.h"
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+void test_furi_memmgr(void) {
+    void* ptr;
+
+    // allocate memory case
+    ptr = malloc(100);
+    mu_check(ptr != NULL);
+    // test that memory is zero-initialized after allocation
+    for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+        mu_assert_int_eq(0, ((uint8_t*)ptr)[i]);
+    }
+    free(ptr);
+
+    // reallocate memory case
+    ptr = malloc(100);
+    memset(ptr, 66, 100);
+    ptr = realloc(ptr, 200);
+    mu_check(ptr != NULL);
+
+    // test that memory is really reallocated
+    for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+        mu_assert_int_eq(66, ((uint8_t*)ptr)[i]);
+    }
+
+    free(ptr);
+
+    // allocate and zero-initialize array (calloc)
+    ptr = calloc(100, 2);
+    mu_check(ptr != NULL);
+    for(int i = 0; i < 100 * 2; i++) {
+        mu_assert_int_eq(0, ((uint8_t*)ptr)[i]);
+    }
+    free(ptr);
+}

applications/debug/unit_tests/tests/furi/furi_pubsub_test.c

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <furi.h>
+#include "../test.h"
+
+const uint32_t context_value = 0xdeadbeef;
+const uint32_t notify_value_0 = 0x12345678;
+const uint32_t notify_value_1 = 0x11223344;
+
+uint32_t pubsub_value = 0;
+uint32_t pubsub_context_value = 0;
+
+void test_pubsub_handler(const void* arg, void* ctx) {
+    pubsub_value = *(uint32_t*)arg;
+    pubsub_context_value = *(uint32_t*)ctx;
+}
+
+void test_furi_pubsub(void) {
+    FuriPubSub* test_pubsub = NULL;
+    FuriPubSubSubscription* test_pubsub_subscription = NULL;
+
+    // init pubsub case
+    test_pubsub = furi_pubsub_alloc();
+    mu_assert_pointers_not_eq(test_pubsub, NULL);
+
+    // subscribe pubsub case
+    test_pubsub_subscription =
+        furi_pubsub_subscribe(test_pubsub, test_pubsub_handler, (void*)&context_value);
+    mu_assert_pointers_not_eq(test_pubsub_subscription, NULL);
+
+    /// notify pubsub case
+    furi_pubsub_publish(test_pubsub, (void*)&notify_value_0);
+    mu_assert_int_eq(pubsub_value, notify_value_0);
+    mu_assert_int_eq(pubsub_context_value, context_value);
+
+    // unsubscribe pubsub case
+    furi_pubsub_unsubscribe(test_pubsub, test_pubsub_subscription);
+
+    /// notify unsubscribed pubsub case
+    furi_pubsub_publish(test_pubsub, (void*)&notify_value_1);
+    mu_assert_int_not_eq(pubsub_value, notify_value_1);
+
+    // delete pubsub case
+    furi_pubsub_free(test_pubsub);
+}

applications/debug/unit_tests/tests/furi/furi_record_test.c

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <furi.h>
+#include "../test.h"
+
+#define TEST_RECORD_NAME "test/holding"
+
+void test_furi_create_open(void) {
+    // Test that record does not exist
+    mu_check(furi_record_exists(TEST_RECORD_NAME) == false);
+
+    // Create record
+    uint8_t test_data = 0;
+    furi_record_create(TEST_RECORD_NAME, (void*)&test_data);
+
+    // Test that record exists
+    mu_check(furi_record_exists(TEST_RECORD_NAME) == true);
+
+    // Open it
+    void* record = furi_record_open(TEST_RECORD_NAME);
+    mu_assert_pointers_eq(record, &test_data);
+
+    // Close it
+    furi_record_close(TEST_RECORD_NAME);
+
+    // Clean up
+    furi_record_destroy(TEST_RECORD_NAME);
+
+    // Test that record does not exist
+    mu_check(furi_record_exists(TEST_RECORD_NAME) == false);
+}

applications/debug/unit_tests/tests/furi/furi_test.c

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <furi.h>
+#include <furi_hal.h>
+#include "../test.h"
+
+// v2 tests
+void test_furi_create_open(void);
+void test_furi_concurrent_access(void);
+void test_furi_pubsub(void);
+
+void test_furi_memmgr(void);
+
+static int foo = 0;
+
+void test_setup(void) {
+    foo = 7;
+}
+
+void test_teardown(void) {
+    /* Nothing */
+}
+
+MU_TEST(test_check) {
+    mu_check(foo != 6);
+}
+
+// v2 tests
+MU_TEST(mu_test_furi_create_open) {
+    test_furi_create_open();
+}
+
+MU_TEST(mu_test_furi_pubsub) {
+    test_furi_pubsub();
+}
+
+MU_TEST(mu_test_furi_memmgr) {
+    // this test is not accurate, but gives a basic understanding
+    // that memory management is working fine
+    test_furi_memmgr();
+}
+
+MU_TEST_SUITE(test_suite) {
+    MU_SUITE_CONFIGURE(&test_setup, &test_teardown);
+
+    MU_RUN_TEST(test_check);
+
+    // v2 tests
+    MU_RUN_TEST(mu_test_furi_create_open);
+    MU_RUN_TEST(mu_test_furi_pubsub);
+    MU_RUN_TEST(mu_test_furi_memmgr);
+}
+
+int run_minunit_test_furi(void) {
+    MU_RUN_SUITE(test_suite);
+
+    return MU_EXIT_CODE;
+}
+
+TEST_API_DEFINE(run_minunit_test_furi)