mirror of
https://github.com/markqvist/Reticulum.git
synced 2026-04-27 08:09:59 -07:00
Updated docs
This commit is contained in:
149
docs/source/networks.rst
Normal file
149
docs/source/networks.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
||||
.. _networks-main:
|
||||
|
||||
*****************
|
||||
Building Networks
|
||||
*****************
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter will provide you with the knowledge needed to build networks with
|
||||
Reticulum, which can often be easier than using traditional stacks, since you
|
||||
don't have to worry about coordinating addresses, subnets and routing for an
|
||||
entire network that you might not know how will evolve in the future. With
|
||||
Reticulum, you can simply add more segments to your network when it becomes
|
||||
necesarry, and Reticulum will handle the convergence of the entire network
|
||||
automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
Concepts & Overview
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
There are important points that need to be kept in mind when building networks
|
||||
with Reticulum:
|
||||
|
||||
* | In a Reticulum network, any node can autonomously generate as many adresses
|
||||
(called *destinations* in Reticulum terminology) as it needs, which become
|
||||
globally reachable to the rest of the network. There is no central point of
|
||||
control over the adress space.
|
||||
|
||||
* | Reticulum was designed to handle both very small, and very large networks.
|
||||
While the adress space can support billions of endpoints, Reticulum is
|
||||
also very useful when just a few devices needs to communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
* | Reticulum provides sender/initiator anonymity by default. There is no way
|
||||
to filter traffic or discriminate it based on the source of the traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
* | All traffic is encrypted using ephemeral keys generated by an Elliptic Curve
|
||||
Diffie-Hellman key exchange on Curve25519. There is no way to inspect traffic
|
||||
contents, and no way to prioritise or throttle certain kinds of traffic.
|
||||
All transport and routing layers are thus completely agnostic to traffic type,
|
||||
and will pass all traffic equally.
|
||||
|
||||
* | Reticulum can function both with and without infrastructure. When *transport
|
||||
nodes* are available, they can route traffic over multiple hops for other
|
||||
nodes, and will function as a distributed cryptographic keystore. When there
|
||||
is no transport nodes available, all nodes that are within communication range
|
||||
can still communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
* | Every node can become a transport node, simply by enabling it in it's
|
||||
configuration, but there is no need for every node on the network to be a
|
||||
transport node. Letting every node be a transport node will in most cases
|
||||
degrade the performance and reliability of the network.
|
||||
|
||||
In general terms, if a node is stationary, well-connected and kept running
|
||||
most of the time, it is a good candidate to be a transport node. For optimal
|
||||
performance, a network should contain the amount of transport nodes that
|
||||
provides connectivity to the intended area / topography, and not many more
|
||||
than that.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reticulum allows you to mix very different kinds of networking mediums into a
|
||||
unified mesh, or to keep everything within one medium. You could build a "virtual
|
||||
network" running entirely over the Internet, where all nodes communicate over TCP
|
||||
and UDP "channels". You could also build such a network using MQTT or ZeroMQ as
|
||||
the underlying carrier for Reticulum.
|
||||
|
||||
However, most real-world networks will probably involve either some form of
|
||||
wireless or direct hardline communications. To allow Reticulum to communicate
|
||||
over any type of medium, you must specify it in the configuration file, by default
|
||||
located at ``~/.reticulum/config``.
|
||||
|
||||
Any number of interfaces can be configured, and Reticulum will automatically
|
||||
decide which are suitable to use in any given situation, depending on where
|
||||
traffic needs to flow.
|
||||
|
||||
Example Scenarios
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
This section illustrates a few example scenarios, and how they would, in general
|
||||
terms, be planned, implemented and configured.
|
||||
|
||||
Interconnected LoRa Sites
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
An organisation wants to provide communication and information services to it's
|
||||
members, which are located mainly in three separate areas. Three suitable hill-top
|
||||
locations are found, where the organisation can install equipment: Site A, B and C.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the amount of data that needs to be exchanged between users is mainly text-
|
||||
based, the bandwidth requirements are low, and LoRa radios are chosen to connect
|
||||
users to the network.
|
||||
|
||||
Due to the hill-top locations found, there is radio line-of-sight between site A
|
||||
and B, and also between site B and C. Because of this, the organisation does not
|
||||
need to use the Internet to interconnect the sites, but purchases four Point-to-Point
|
||||
WiFi based radios for interconnecting the sites.
|
||||
|
||||
At each site, a Raspberry Pi is installed to function as a gateway. A LoRa radio
|
||||
is connected to the Pi with a USB cable, and the WiFi radio is connected to the
|
||||
ethernet port of the Pi. At site B, two WiFi radios are needed to be able to reach
|
||||
both site A and site C, so an extra ethernet adapter is connected to the Pi in
|
||||
this location.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the hardware has been installed, Reticulum is installed on all the Pis, and at
|
||||
site A and C, one interface is added for the LoRa radio, as well as one for the WiFi
|
||||
radio. At site B, an interface for the LoRa radio, and one interface for each WiFi
|
||||
radio is added to the Reticulum configuration file. The transport node option is
|
||||
enabled in the configuration of all three gateways.
|
||||
|
||||
The network is now operational, and ready to serve users across all three areas.
|
||||
The organisation prepares a LoRa radio that is supplied to the end users, along
|
||||
with a Reticulum configuration file, that contains the right parameters for
|
||||
communicating with the LoRa radios installed at the gateway sites.
|
||||
|
||||
Once users connect to the network, anyone will be able to communicate with anyone
|
||||
else across all three sites.
|
||||
|
||||
Bridging Over the Internet
|
||||
==========================
|
||||
|
||||
As the organisation grows, several new communities form in places too far away
|
||||
from the core network to be reachable over WiFi links. New gateways similar to those
|
||||
previously installed are set up for the new communities at the new sites D and E, but
|
||||
they are islanded from the core network, and only serve the local users.
|
||||
|
||||
After investigating the options, it is found that it is possible to install an
|
||||
Internet connection at site A, and an interface on the Internet connection is
|
||||
configured for Reticulum on the Raspberry Pi at site A.
|
||||
|
||||
A member of the organisation at site D, named Dori, is willing to help by sharing
|
||||
the Internet connection she already has in her home, and is able to leave a Raspberry
|
||||
Pi running. A new Reticulum interface is configured on her Pi, connecting to the newly
|
||||
enabled Internet interface on the gateway at site A. Dori is now connected to both
|
||||
all the nodes at her own local site (through the hill-top LoRa gateway), and all the
|
||||
combined users of sites A, B and C. She then enables transport on her node, and
|
||||
traffic from site D can now reach everyone at site A, B and C, and vice versa.
|
||||
|
||||
Growth and Convergence
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
||||
As the organisation grows, more gateways are added to keep up with the growing user
|
||||
base. Some local gateways even add VHF radios and packet modems to reach outlying users
|
||||
and communities that are out of reach for the LoRa radios and WiFi backhauls.
|
||||
|
||||
As more sites, gateways and users are connected, the amount of coordination required
|
||||
is kept to a minimum. If one community wants to add connectivity to the next one
|
||||
over, it can simply be done without having to involve everyone or coordinate address
|
||||
space or routing tables.
|
||||
|
||||
With the added geographical coverage, the operators at site A one day find that
|
||||
the original internet bridged interfaces are no longer utilised. The network has
|
||||
converged to be completely self-connected, and the sites that were once poorly
|
||||
connected outliers are now an integral part of the network.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user