Release v1.3.0: Multi-source downloads, audio analyzer resilience, mobile improvements
Major Features: - Multi-source download system (Soulseek/Lidarr with fallback) - Configurable enrichment speed control (1-5x) - Mobile touch drag support for seek sliders - iOS PWA media controls (Control Center, Lock Screen) - Artist name alias resolution via Last.fm - Circuit breaker pattern for audio analysis Critical Fixes: - Audio analyzer stability (non-ASCII, BrokenProcessPool, OOM) - Discovery system race conditions and import failures - Radio decade categorization using originalYear - LastFM API response normalization - Mood bucket infinite loop prevention Security: - Bull Board admin authentication - Lidarr webhook signature verification - JWT token expiration and refresh - Encryption key validation on startup Closes #2, #6, #9, #13, #21, #26, #31, #34, #35, #37, #40, #43
This commit is contained in:
64
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
vendored
Normal file
64
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
name: Feature Request
|
||||
description: Suggest a new feature or enhancement
|
||||
title: "[Feature]: "
|
||||
labels: ["enhancement", "needs triage"]
|
||||
body:
|
||||
- type: markdown
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
value: |
|
||||
Thanks for suggesting a feature! Please provide as much detail as possible.
|
||||
|
||||
- type: textarea
|
||||
id: problem
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Problem or Use Case
|
||||
description: What problem does this feature solve? What are you trying to accomplish?
|
||||
placeholder: "I'm trying to... but currently..."
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: textarea
|
||||
id: solution
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Proposed Solution
|
||||
description: Describe the feature you'd like to see implemented.
|
||||
placeholder: Describe your ideal solution...
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: textarea
|
||||
id: alternatives
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Alternatives Considered
|
||||
description: Have you considered any alternative solutions or workarounds?
|
||||
placeholder: Describe alternatives you've considered...
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: false
|
||||
|
||||
- type: dropdown
|
||||
id: scope
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Feature Scope
|
||||
description: How big of a change is this?
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- Small (UI tweak, minor enhancement)
|
||||
- Medium (new component, significant enhancement)
|
||||
- Large (new major feature, architectural change)
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: checkboxes
|
||||
id: contribution
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Contribution
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- label: I would be willing to help implement this feature
|
||||
required: false
|
||||
|
||||
- type: checkboxes
|
||||
id: checklist
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: Checklist
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- label: I have searched existing issues to ensure this hasn't already been requested
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user